Pegasus Airlines: strong 2Q2013 earnings growth for the ‘low-cost network carrier’


In 2Q2013, Pegasus Airlines' core operations grew revenues by 30% and more than tripled the operating profit, continuing the strong earnings momentum developed in 1Q2013. Traffic grew strongly, load factor rose, RASK increased, CASK fell and cash increased sharply after a successful IPO in Apr-2013, since when its share price has gained 46%.

The only blot on the landscape was that ex fuel CASK increased a little in 2Q2013 as labour costs grew steeply, but the 1H2013 performance of both items was more favourable and so this may simply be a temporary issue.

Pegasus' mission statement says: "We aim to combine the network benefits of full-service carriers, and the price benefits of LCCs, to provide inexpensive travel, on-time performance and new planes." It does not mention profits, but, if it can continue to fulfil these aims, it seems that profit growth will also continue.

  • Pegasus Airlines reported a 42% increase in net profit in 2Q2013, with revenues up 16%.
  • The core Pegasus operation saw revenue growth of 30% and more than tripled its operating profit.
  • Traffic grew strongly, with passenger numbers increasing by 19% and load factor reaching 80%.
  • Ancillary revenues accounted for 13% of total revenues, with a target of EUR10-12 per passenger within the next three years.
  • Operating costs increased by 5% year on year, with labour costs growing by 41% in 2Q2012.
  • Pegasus plans to add to its network and increase frequencies on existing routes, focusing on markets with low LCC penetration.

Strong earnings growth in 2Q2013

Pegasus Airlines reported a 42% increase in its 2Q2013 net profit versus 2Q2012, with revenues up 16%. The underlying performance is better reflected in the results of the core Pegasus operation, which excludes the charter activities of airberlin Turkey (which ceased in 1Q2013). This core business saw revenue growth of 30% and more than tripled its operating profit to TRY97 million.

For the first half of 2013, the core Pegasus operation grew revenues by 35% and turned an operating loss of TRY40 million in 1H2012 into an operating profit of TRY98 million. Pegasus' cash balance increased over the half-year from TRY210 million at the end of 2012 to TRY858 million, reflecting IPO proceeds and strong operating cash flow.

Pegasus Airlines financial and operating highlights 2Q2013

TRY million except where stated




Total revenue

520.3 605.3 16.3%

Operating costs

486.8 508.5 4.5%

Operating profit*

33.5 96.8 189.0%

Operating margin %

6.4 16.0

+9.6 ppts

Net profit

35.6 50.5 41.9%

Pegasus operation revenue

465.8 605.3 29.9%

Pegasus operation costs

435.1 508.5 16.9%

Operating profit Pegasus operation*

30.7 96.8 215.3%

Operating margin Pegasus operation %

6.6 16.0 9.4 ppts

Total passengers million

3.6 4.3 18.7%

Passenger Load Factor %

79.1 80.0

+0.9 ppts

ASK million




RASK kurus

10.74 11.61 8.1%

CASK kurus

10.03 9.75


EX-fuel CASK kurus

5.68 5.74 1.2%

Strong traffic growth, particularly international

Pegasus added 17% more seats year on year in 2Q2013 and carried 19% more passengers, continuing the growth seen in 1Q2013. Growth was fastest on the international network, where passenger numbers increased by 21%.

ASKs grew by 20% and load factor grew by 0.9 ppts to reach 80.0% and average sector length grew by 2.5%. For the half year, utilisation increased by almost 9% to reach 12.1 hours per day.

Pegasus Airlines traffic data 2Q2013 and 1H2013

Pegasus has been growing rapidly for a number of years. Its scheduled domestic passenger numbers grew at a compound average growth rate of 36% pa from 2008 to 2012 and its scheduled international passenger growth was 43% over this period.

These figures compare with Turkish Airlines' rates of 10% and 19% respectively. Pegasus' overall 2008-2012 CAGR of 38% pa for scheduled passengers ranks among the fastest growing airlines in the world.

Pegasus passenger growth versus international peers

Revenues up 30%

Group revenues grew by 16% to reach TRY605 million, but the like-for-like growth of the core Pegasus operation revenues was 30%. This was faster than the growth in ASKs and RASK was up by 8%. The biggest source of revenues, scheduled flights, generated revenue growth of 27%, while ancillary revenues outperformed, growing at almost 35%.

Pegasus Airlines revenues 2Q2013 vs 2Q2012

TRY million




% of 2Q2013 total

Scheduled flight revenue

366.4 465.4 27.0%


Ancillary revenue

59.6 80.2 34.6%


Charter revenue

33.9 46.1 36.0%


Other revenue

5.9 13.6 130.5%


Pegasus operation revenue

465.8 605.3 29.9%


Airberlin Turkey operation revenue





Total revenue

520.3 605.3 16.3%


Ancillary revenues accounted for 13% of revenues, up from 12% in the full year 2012, but its ancillary revenues per passenger lag the levels achieved by many other LCCs. This is one of Pegasus' focus areas for further growth and it has a target of EUR10-12 per passenger within the next three years, compared with a little more than EUR7 in 2012.

Pegasus Airlines ancillary revenue per passenger versus international peers

Costs were up 17%

Group operating costs increased by 5% year on year in 2Q2013, but the cessation of the airberlin Turkey operation distorts the comparison. On a like-for-like basis, core Pegasus operation costs increased by 17%, less then the growth in ASKs and revenues. Cost per ASK fell by 2.8%, although this was assisted significantly by lower fuel prices. The fuel bill grew by only 11%, much lower than the 20% growth in ASKs, and CASK ex fuel increased by 1.2%. This contrasts with 1Q2013, when CASK ex fuel fell by 11.5%. For the half year, it was down by 4.45

Labour costs grew by 41% in 2Q2012 and this accounts for the increase in ex fuel CASK as all other costs grew more slowly than capacity. For the half-year, labour costs grew by 25%, only a little more than the 23% growth in ASKs, so this sharp increase in 2Q labour costs may just reflect timing differences between employee costs and future capacity growth. Certainly, it will be important to ensure that Pegasus' good levels of labour productivity do not deteriorate.

See related report: European airline labour productivity: CAPA rankings

Pegasus Airlines operating costs 2Q2013 vs 2Q2012

TRY miillion




% of 2Q2013 total

Fuel costs

188.8 209.0 10.7%


Labour costs

54.7 77.3 41.3%


All other costs

191.6 222.2 16.0%


Pegasus operation costs

435.1 508.5 16.9%


Airberlin Turkey operation costs




Total costs

486.8 508.5 4.5%

Airbus aircraft to join Pegasus' Boeing fleet

Pegasus operated an average of 41.6 aircraft in 2Q2013, compared with 37.4 in the year 2012. Improvements in aircraft utilisation and load factor have allowed Pegasus to generate passenger traffic growth at a faster rate than fleet growth. At the end of 2012, its fleet was all Boeing, with 38 737-800s and two 737-400s

Pegasus Airlines average number of operated aircraft 2008 to 2Q2013

Pegasus will take delivery of six Boeing 737-800NG aircraft from 2013 to 2015, which it expects to finance through sale and leaseback. In Jul-2012, it placed an order with Airbus for 75 new aircraft comprising 57 A320neo and 18 A321neo (plus options for 25 further aircraft) for delivery from 2015.

Pegasus Airlines aircraft deliveries 2013 to 2022

Pegasus fleet plan has considerable flexibility in terms of it possible growth path. In its upside case, it could grow to 126 aircraft by 2022, while its downside case would see a total of 75 aircraft in 2022.

Pegasus Airlines upside and downside year end number of aircraft 2013 to 2022

Eleven more routes in 2013; further network expansion to follow

The number of destinations served by Pegasus is also growing rapidly. By the end of 2013, it expects to add five international routes and six domestic routes to its 2012 total. This will mean that is network will have 42 international destinations and 29 domestic destinations, up considerably from 24 and 18 respectively in 2010. Its main hub is at Istanbul Sabiha Gokcen, while it also has additional hubs at Izmir, Antalya and Adana.

Pegasus route network

Looking beyond 2013, Pegasus plans to add to its network and to increase frequencies on existing routes, thereby stimulating demand. The key to this will be maintaining a cost and pricing advantage over rivals.

The focus for international expansion will be on markets where trips per capita and LCC penetration remain low. Regions such as Eastern Europe, the Middle East and North Africa meet these criteria. Pegasus is also considering new destinations in Western Europe, although LCC penetration is already relatively high in the region.

Pegasus Airlines potential expansion

Efficient operations have been a key to success

In addition to its low fares, enabled by its low cost base, Pegasus is keen to stress the efficiency of its operations.

Its on-time performance improved from 76.8% in 2009 to 92.3% in 2012 and has stayed over 90% in the first half of 2013. Its 2012 level was a little higher than those of both Ryanair and easyJet. Aircraft utilisation has more or less plateaued since 2009 and, although 1H2013 has seen higher utilisation than 1H2012, Pegasus expects a similar level for FY2013 as seen in FY2012.

Pegasus Airlines on-time performance 2008 to 2Q2013

Pegasus Airlines aircraft utilisation (hours) and turns per day 2008 to 2Q2013

Pegasus' aircraft orders are a higher percentage of its existing fleet than for any other significant carrier based in Turkey.

Its fleet is the second largest in Turkey, behind Turkish Airlines (THY), but its orders represent 184% of its fleet, compared with 90% for THY. At present, none of atlasjet, SunExpress, or Onurair has any aircraft on order. Pegasus' low costs, network scale and aggressive growth plans should help to keep it ahead of these smaller Turkish competitors.

Aircraft orders and domestic route overlap: Pegasus versus competitors

2013 passenger growth target of 15%

For 2013, Pegasus targets passenger growth of around 15%. Beyond that, its plans to add ASK capacity at a rate of 12% to 16% pa over the next three years. It sees utilisation rates for 2013 at a similar level to 2012, but increasing in the future as more night flights are introduced and the network grows. Pegasus expects load factors to continue to grow and targets a level of more than 80% in the short to mid term.

In terms of costs, it anticipates stable CASK in the near term, but its Continuous Improvement Team (CIT) is pursuing further cost reduction initiatives and it plans to reduce CASK beyond the near term.

Pegasus management estimates of the achievements of its CIT team

Pegasus: an Ultra-LCC with strong earnings growth prospects

Pegasus' CASK level puts it in the ultra-LCC bracket among European airlines, but its business model includes some features not typically associated with the purist LCC approach. For example, although it has a point to point focus, its Sabiha Gokcen hub also offers network feed to increase volume for international routes and reduce seasonality for domestic routes. In addition, it embraces features that are now becoming more common among LCCs, but are more traditionally associated with FSC, such as seat selection, the use of GDS and code sharing.

In CAPA's previous report on Pegasus (9-May-2013), we compared its unit costs with those of other European carriers and concluded that it ranks alongside Ryanair and Wizz Air as a truly low cost carrier. We also noted the following:

"Importantly, we estimate that Pegasus has unit costs that are 38% below those of Turkish Airlines on short/medium-haul. This cost advantage, built on an efficient labour force, coupled with Pegasus' position in the fast-growing Turkish and Central/Eastern European markets, give it a strong position for future earnings growth."

The evidence of Pegasus' 2Q2013 results is that is building on that position and delivering that growth.

See related report: Pegasus Airlines: a true LCC growing traffic and earnings at a winged gallop

Want More Analysis Like This?

CAPA Membership provides access to all news and analysis on the site, along with access to many areas of our comprehensive databases and toolsets.
Find Out More