Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Secretary General, Surin Pitsuwan, stated it would consider two frameworks for economic integration in East Asia, with one framework one backed by Japan the other by China, next week (Japan Today, 20-Aug-2010). ASEAN added that it would likely merge the two ideas into a single framework, with Mr Pitsuwan commenting: ‘‘Since last year in Bangkok, ASEAN decided to pursue the two approaches in parallel. I am sure the same line will be taken this year." Japan is seeking regional economic integration to involve the 16 countries (10 ASEAN countries plus Japan, China, South Korea, India, Australia and New Zealand), while China reportedly prefers integration to be confined to the ASEAN members, Japan, China and South Korea. Both papers target 2015 as the deadline for East Asian economic integration, in line with ASEAN’s goal of an ASEAN Economic Community by then.
ASEAN to consider two frameworks for economic integration in East Asia
You may also be interested in the following articles...
Southeast Asia Fleet Outlook:
Southeast Asia, along with the Middle East, are the only two regions with as nearly as many aircraft on order as in the active fleet. Southeast Asian airlines currently have nearly 1700 aircraft on order compared to an active fleet of approximately 1800 aircraft.
Finnair and TAP Portugal: their location based long haul niche strategies compared
Both Finnair and TAP are based in peripheral corners of Europe: Finnair in the extreme northeast and TAP in the southwest. Both are based in countries with relatively small populations, but they have developed networks that capitalise on their geographic location to carry connecting traffic from across Europe and elsewhere to long haul destinations in other continents.
TAP's main long haul market is Upper South America (primarily Brazil), but it also has a secondary long haul niche in Africa. Finnair's main long haul market is Northeast Asia, with an additional presence in South and Southeast Asia. Both also operate to the US. On short haul, LCC competition has been a bigger threat to TAP than to Finnair, but cost savings are important to both.
TAP and Finnair have similar traffic volumes, unit costs and average trip lengths. Moreover, both have struggled to generate sustainable profitability. This report compares and contrasts Europe's two leading independent exponents of the location based long haul niche strategy. Both are set to accelerate their long haul growth.