US National Transportation Safety Board stated (07-Mar-2013) it continues to focus on the design, certification and manufacturing processes of the lithium-ion battery system used on the grounded Boeing 787, noting it has yet to reach a conclusion about what caused a lithium-ion battery fire aboard a Japan Airlines 787 at Boston Logan International Airport in Jan-2013. The lithium-ion battery used to start the aircraft’s APU, manufactured by GS Yuasa, remains central to the investigation. The APU battery consists of eight lithium-ion cells, assembled in two rows of four cells each. Each cell contains a flammable electrolyte liquid, and has a nominal voltage of 3.7 volts. When the JAL incident battery was disassembled, cells 5 through 8 on the right side of the battery showed the most thermal and mechanical damage, according to the NTSB. “Thermal damage was the most severe near cell 6,” the interim report explains, noting: “Continuity measurements using a digital volt meter indicated that all of the cells were found to be electrically short circuited except for cell 8". The means all except one of the battery cells were electrically short-circuited. Vent discs were found to be opened slightly on cells 1 through 3, intact on cell 4 and “opened more completely, leaving a ruptured appearance” on cells 5 through 8, the NTSB said. The aircraft’s flight data recorder (FDR) showed the APU was started while the 787 was being taxied to the gate after arriving in Boston. Smoke was later detected in the aft cabin by cleaning personnel. At around the same time, a maintenance manager in the cockpit observed that the APU had shut down automatically. “The FDR data also showed that, about 36 seconds before the APU shut down…the voltage of the APU battery began fluctuating, dropping from a full charge of 32 volts to 28 volts about seven seconds before the (APU) shutdown,” the NTSB said. [more - original PR] [more - original PR - Interim Factual Report] [more - original PR - Presentation] [more - original PR - Oct-2007 FAA special condition for 787 lithium ion battery installation]
NTSB yet to reach conclusion on cause of 787 lithium-ion battery fire
You may also be interested in the following articles...
US airlines: a turnaround in unit revenue just as cost pressures rise in 2017
The four largest US airlines are moving closer to returning to positive unit revenue in 2017 after each of those companies has issued an improved unit revenue forecast for 4Q2016, driven by stronger yields and continued improvement in close in bookings. The yield improvement indicates that the US domestic environment is gaining some pricing traction after two years of weak fares, and the results on close in bookings continue a trend that emerged in the US market during late 3Q2016 and continued through the rest of the year.
Delta and Southwest have both publicly cited a bump in demand since the US presidential election in Nov-2016. Delta has expressed cautious optimism that the US revenue environment has turned a corner, and the positive momentum is driving the company’s confidence of climbing out of a negative unit revenue performance in 1Q2017.
Key to sustaining unit revenue momentum is keeping capacity in check over the course of 2017. American, Delta, United and Southwest have all declared their intentions to lower capacity growth in 2017, and show no intentions of revising those targets upwards. Rising fuel cost and non fuel cost inflation are the major headwinds for US airlines in 2017, which has resulted in Delta declaring margin compression for the year.
Lufthansa and Etihad: equity tie up could further align mutual strategy, but marriage unlikely
Greater cooperation between Lufthansa and Etihad reflects their local and global challenges growing in quantity and complexity. Contact between the two has led to speculation that the partnership could radically expand to include an equity tie up, with rumoured merger talks.
Their initial Dec-2016 codeshare announcement was, in practical terms, small but showed the possibility, as they stated, to expand cooperation. However, it would be a leap to go from their handful of codeshares to a 17-Jan-2017 article from Italian daily newspaper Il Messaggero that Etihad could invest in Lufthansa on the way to a possible merger between the two. A subsequent denial in a Reuters story that "A financial stake is out of the question at the moment", does little to dispel the rumour. Were it not for the last three words of that statement the rumour would lack credibility.
There is certainly logic for a deeper partnership - and the two have danced this waltz before. Equity involvement from airlines can cement partnerships, add to board influence and partially allow one side to gain financially from any matter it feels it is compromising away. Nevertheless, there are obstacles to a full blown merger, and even to Etihad's taking a 30% to 40% stake. A marriage between the new bedfellows does not seem an immediate prospect. Nonetheless the logic is there for a move; and the mere fact of a potential move is sufficient to rock the equilibrium.