Loading

Pegasus Airlines: time for Turkey's leading LCC to reassert its CASK cutting credentials

Analysis

Pegasus Airlines is Turkey's self-styled 'network low-cost carrier'. It operates many of the features of the classic LCC business model: low fares, single cabin class, modern fleet, focus on internet distribution and a short/medium-haul network. But it also offers network feed (27% of international passengers in 2013) and product features that, until recently at least, have been less typically associated with LCCs in Europe. These include belly cargo, assigned seating and the use of both GDS and travel agents.

In spite of these 'deviations' from the purist LCC model, Pegasus has the second lowest unit costs among European airlines, bracketing it with Ryanair and Wizz Air in the ultra-LCC category.

In 2013, Pegasus increased its core operating profit by 40%, although currency movements hit the net result and a trend of rising CASK in recent years will need to be controlled. Although partly driven by exchange rate movements, and offset by a rising RASK trend, CASK increases do not sit well with any version of the LCC model.

Summary
  • Pegasus Airlines is Turkey's self-styled ‘network low-cost carrier’.
  • Pegasus has the second lowest unit costs among European airlines, bracketing it with Ryanair and Wizz Air in the ultra-LCC category.
  • In 2013, Pegasus increased its core operating profit by 40%.
  • Pegasus reported a 30% drop in net profit for 2013, significantly affected by foreign exchange losses.
  • Pegasus plans to grow ASKs and passenger numbers by around 20% in 2014.
  • Pegasus aims to achieve further load factor gains and to exceed 82% over the mid-term.

Net profit falls, but operating result improves to keep Pegasus at number two by margin in Europe

Pegasus reported a 30% drop in net profit for 2013, to TRY88 million (EUR35 million). This result was significantly affected by foreign exchange losses on non-Turkish Lira denominated assets and liabilities. The group's operating profit increased by 46% to TRY276 million (EUR109 million), or, by 40% to TRY279 million (EUR110 million) without the small loss of the airberlin Turkey operation.

The revenues of the core Pegasus operation grew by 34% to TRY2,395 million (EUR950 million), with ASKs up almost 23%. The operating margin for the core Pegasus operation was 11.6%, an improvement of 0.6 ppts, maintaining Pegasus' number two ranking (to Ryanair) in the list of Europe's most profitable airlines by operating margin.

Performance weakened in 4Q2013, with the operating result in the core operation falling to a loss of TRY41 million (EUR15 million), versus a profit of TRY51 million in 4Q2012.

Pegasus Airlines financial and operating highlights: 2013

TRY million except where stated

2012

2013

Change

Total revenue

1,919.9

2,404.1

25.2%

Operating costs

1,731.5

2,128.4

22.9%

Operating profit*

188.4

275.7

46.3%

Operating margin %

9.8

11.5

1.7ppts

Net profit

126.3

88.0

-38.3

Pegasus operation revenue

1,791.8

2,395.2

33.7%

Pegasus operation costs

1,593.6

2,116.7

32.8%

Operating profit Pegasus operation*, **

198.2

278.5

40.5%

Operating margin Pegasus operation %

11.1

11.6

0.6ppts

Cash and equivalent

210.2

877.4

667.2

Net debt

1,216.7

749.0

-467.7

Total passengers million

13.6

16.8

23.9%

Passenger Load Factor %

78.2

80.2

2.0ppts

ASK million

16,429

20,162

22.7%

RASK kurus

10.91

11.88

8.9%

CASK kurus

9.70

10.50

8.2%

Ex-fuel CASK kurus

5.42

6.20

14.2%

Operating profit growth trend reconfirmed and balance sheet strengthened in 2013

Pegasus' group revenues grew by 146% between 2010 and 2013 at a compound average growth rate of 35% pa. Although the rate of growth is slowing a little, it remains one of the fastest growing airlines in Europe by revenue growth. Moreover, the increase in operating profit in 2013 confirms the trend of improving profitability after the dip in 2011.

The IPO of Apr-2013 raised TRY483 million (EUR164 million), helping to increase the group's cash balance from TRY210 million at the end of 2012 to TRY877 million (EUR298 million) at the end of 2013. This is equivalent to 133 days of revenues, providing a very substantial liquidity cushion.

On balance sheet net debt fell by TRY468 million to end the year at TRY749 million (EUR254 million), while book equity increased from TRY327 million to TRY1,146 million (EUR389 million). Adjusted net debt, including operating leases capitalised at eight times annual payments, fell from TRY1.9 billion to TRY1.7 billion. All in all, Pegasus' balance sheet looks to be in a robust state of health.

Pegasus Airlines operating profit, net profit (left hand axis, TRY million) and revenue (right hand axis, TRY million): 2011 to 2013

Pegasus' load factor was up 2.0 ppts

Pegasus' passenger numbers increased by 23.9% to 16.8 million in 2013, with ASKs up 22.7% and load factor gaining 2.0 ppts to reach 80.2%. Load factor has improved by almost 5 ppts since 2011 and is broadly similar to the average levels achieved by legacy carriers in Europe (ie AEA members), but it remains short of those reported by Europe's two largest LCCs (around 82% for Ryanair and 89% for easyJet).

Pegasus Airlines development of passenger numbers (left hand axis, million) and passenger load factor (right hand axis, %): 2008 to 2013

Growth in the number of seats was similar in both the domestic and international networks, but international ASK growth of 24.4% exceeded domestic ASK growth of 19.8%, reflecting stage length increases in the international network. International passenger growth was also faster than on the domestic network.

Transfer passengers (those taking two or more successive Pegasus flights under one ticket) accounted for 27% of international passengers (up from 24% in 2012). This feature of Pegasus marks it apart from the typical LCC business model in Europe (with the other notable exception being Vueling).

Pegasus Airlines operating statistics: 2013

Core revenues up more than one third

Revenue growth in the core Pegasus operation was 33.7%, faster than the growth in ASKs and passenger numbers. This was partly due to the weakening of the Turkish currency (in EUR, revenue growth was 22.2%). International flight revenues outperformed, seeing growth of 35.9%. Domestic flight revenues grew by 25.3%.

Ancillary revenues also performed strongly, growing by 47.8% in 2013. Ancillary revenues per passenger increased by 19% to TRY20.2 (EUR8.0), a strong improvement, but below the levels achieved by other European LCCs. Pegasus CCO Guliz Ozturk said that ancillaries were the most profitable part of the company, with margins of more than 90%. The carrier aims to increase ancillary revenues per passenger to EUR10-12 within the next three years.

Pegasus Airlines revenues (TRY million): 2011 to 2013

2011

2012

2013

Change
2013 vs 2012

% of 2013

International flight revenue

807.3

1,096.8

35.9%

45.6%

807.3

Domestic flight revenue

622.6

780.4

25.3%

32.5%

622.6

Scheduled flight revenue

1,429.9

1,877.2

31.3%

78.1%

1,429.9

Ancillary revenue

230.2

340.3

47.8%

14.2%

230.2

Charter revenue

106.7

127.5

19.5%

5.3%

106.7

Other revenue

25.0

50.1

100.6%

2.1%

25.0

Pegasus operation revenue

1,791.8

2,395.2

33.7%

99.6%

1,791.8

AirBerlin Turkey operation revenue

128.1

8.9

-93.1%

0.4%

128.1

Total revenue

1,919.9

2,404.1

25.2%

100.0%

1,919.9

Costs grow faster than ASKs, but less than revenues

Operating costs in the core Pegasus operation increased by 32.8%, less than revenue growth, but faster than ASK growth and passenger growth. As with costs, revenues were inflated by the weaker TRY (core operating costs translated into EUR grew by 21.4%).

Fuel costs, the largest category at 41% of the total, increased at the slower rate of 23.5%. Ex fuel costs increased by 40.2%.

Pegasus Airlines operating costs (TRY million): 2012 to 2013

2012

2013

Change
2013 vs 2012

% of 2013

Jet fuel

702.4

867.4

23.5%

41.0%

Personnel

197.6

274.4

38.9%

13.0%

Handling

111.2

156.2

40.5%

7.4%

Depreciation and amortisation

104.4

136.4

30.7%

6.4%

Navigation

103.2

143.1

38.7%

6.8%

Operating lease

84.8

116.1

37.0%

5.5%

Sales & marketing

71.8

93.3

29.9%

4.4%

Maintenance

70.0

108.3

54.7%

5.1%

Landing

39.7

60.4

52.1%

2.9%

Passenger service & catering

20.1

25.2

25.4%

1.2%

Other

88.5

135.9

53.6%

6.4%

Pegasus operation costs

1,593.6

2,116.7

32.8%

100.0%

airberlin Turkey costs

137.9

11.7

-91.5%

Total

1,731.5

2,128.4

22.9%

Pegasus' labour productivity has however slipped

Labour costs, 13% of the total, grew by 39%, although average headcount grew by only 26%. Translated into EUR, labour costs grew at the slower rate of 27%, but still outpaced headcount growth.

Previous CAPA analysis has shown that Pegasus ranks quite well relative to other European airlines on labour productivity measures, although it is behind the other leading LCCs on ATK per employee. In 2013, it has gone backwards on all the labour productivity measures that we analyse (see table below).

Pegasus Airlines labour productivity measures

2011

2012

2013

Change
2013 vs 2012

Average headcount*

1,871

2,048

2,572

25.6%

Total labour cost EUR million

69

86

109

26.9%

Employee cost per employee (EUR)

36,883

41,877

42,312

1.0%

ATK ('000) per employee

800

802

784

-2.3%

Employee costs per ATK (EUR cent)

4.61

5.22

5.40

3.4%

Revenue per employee EUR

333,902

379,742

369,331

-2.7%

First A320neo is expected in 2016

The Pegasus fleet consisted of 49 aircraft at the end of 2013. Almost all of these were Boeing narrowbodies, although the company leased two Airbus A320s during the year. At the end of 2013, it still had three more Boeing 737-800s to be delivered from the 40 ordered in 2005. (According to the CAPA Fleet Database, one of these has now been delivered and Pegasus has also taken its fleet of leased A320s to three aircraft, as of 6-Mar-2014).

Pegasus also has an outstanding order for 75 Airbus A320neo (and options for a further 25), with the first delivery under this order expected in 2016. Pegasus expects to finance the neos with Export Credit Agency financing, EETCs and JOLCO structures, at least for the first half of the deliveries.

Speaking at Pegasus' Capital Markets Day in London, CEO Sertac Haybat said that the cost disadvantages of operating a dual fleet would be offset by the lower fuel burn of the A320neo compared with the Boeing 737-800. He also saw additional route opportunities from the longer range of the new Airbus aircraft. Developments in Turkey's bilateral agreements will continue to be a key factor in the expansion of Pegasus' international route network.

Pegasus Airlines fleet at 31-Dec-2013

Pegasus Airlines aircraft delivery schedule

20% growth planned in 2014, with stable RASK and CASK expected

Pegasus plans to grow ASKs and passenger numbers by around 20% in 2014, outgrowing expected market growth by around 10%.

See related report: Turkey's aviation market: healthy growth to continue at one of the world's oldest cross-roads

It aims to achieve further load factor gains and to exceed 82% over the mid term. Competitive pressure at its Sabiha Gokcen base, where Turkish Airlines is increasing its presence due to the lack of capacity at Istanbul Ataturk, is likely to lead to downward yield pressure.

Pegasus expects that load factor gains will offset yield declines, leading to stable RASK in 2014. It is also guiding towards stable unit costs. The relative development of RASK and CASK is key to the development of operating profit and recent history shows that, for Pegasus, both grow typically.

Pegasus has a track record of RASK growth outpacing CASK growth...

In 2013, Pegasus' unit cost (cost per available seat km, CASK) increased by 8.2% and its ex fuel CASK grew even faster, by 14.4%.

Currency movements had an impact on unit costs: in EUR terms, ex fuel CASK increased by 4.4% and total CASK fell by 1.1%. Around 84% of Pegasus' operating costs are in USD (57%) and EUR (27%), which means that they are inflated when translated into TRY if the Turkish currency has weakened (as happened in 2013).

A large part of the remaining ex fuel CASK increase was due to a change in ground handling arrangements at Sabiha Gokcen and changes in shifts for maintenance workers. These items particularly affected 4Q2013, when CASK was up 19.7%.

Fortunately, growth in RASK (revenue per available seat km) was 8.9% in 2013, faster than CASK growth for the year. More than half of Pegasus' revenues are in EUR (41%) and USD (11%) and this portion of revenues was inflated when translated into TRY due to the weakening of the Turkish currency during the year. Expressed in EUR, unit revenues were down by 0.4%.

Since 2010, ex fuel CASK has increased by 24% and CASK has increased by 35%, partly reflecting a reduction in average stage lengths, but also reflecting currency movements. In EUR, CASK has increased only 7% since 2010.

The CASK increase in 2013 came in spite of a longer stage length, but was mainly explained by currency and the changes noted above. Certainly, it will be important for Pegasus to demonstrate that this disproportionate CASK increase, compared with sector length, is not repeated in 2014. It still has one of the lowest levels of unit cost in Europe, but will need to work to ensure it does not continue to creep upwards.

See related report: Pegasus Airlines: a true LCC growing traffic and earnings at a winged gallop

Pegasus has managed to increase RASK ahead of CASK, with unit revenues growing by 47% from 2010 to 2013. This suggests that, in spite of rapid capacity growth, it has a fair degree of pricing power as a result of having lower fares than its principal competitors. As long as its fares remain significantly below the market, it seems that it can raise them to offset cost increases. This is reinforced by a growing brand quality perception and strong product and service features.

…but can this be sustained?

Nevertheless, Pegasus should not rely on the recent trend of RASK growth outpacing CASK growth to improve profits. Rather, it would be better served by seeking to reduce its already very low CASK to protect itself from any interruption in its ability to grow RASK.

The second half of 2013 highlights the risks of relying on RASK growth. Pegasus saw a fairly uniform RASK growth of 8%-9% in each quarter of 2013, but the performance of CASK deteriorated sharply through the year. CASK fell by almost 6% in 1H2013, before rising 12% in 3Q and almost 20% in 4Q, exceeding the carrier's ability to pass on cost increases through higher RASK.

See related report: Pegasus: even the best business models hit turbulence as 3Q2013 net result falls 27%

Mr Haybat's presentation at the Capital Markets Day in London made reference to Pegasus' "relentless focus on cost control". He will no doubt be seeking to demonstrate this in 2014.

Pegasus Airlines index of revenue per available seat kilometre (RASK) and cost per available seat kilometre (CASK) 2010 to 2013 (indexed to 2010 = 100)

Want More Analysis Like This?

CAPA Membership provides access to all news and analysis on the site, along with access to many areas of our comprehensive databases and toolsets.
Find Out More