- Passenger numbers: 979,214, +62.2%;
- Domestic: 493,109, +67.4%;
- International: 486,105, +57.2%.
Santiago pax traffic up 62.2% in Mar-2011
You may also be interested in the following articles...
Avianca Brazil faces tough conditions and fierce competition on new international flights
Brazil’s fourth largest domestic airline, Avianca Brazil, has opted to branch out internationally with new service to Miami and Santiago, Chile, joining formidable competitors in each market that will compete fiercely with a new rival. Avianca Brazil’s competitors have significant strength in each market, with an ability to market vast network connections in conjunction with their partners.
Avianca Brazil’s decision to add international destinations occurs as its domestic growth continues unabated, despite warnings by its Brazilian rivals that overcapacity in the domestic market could threaten a slow recovery of yields that is just starting to take shape.
Avianca Brazil’s branching out into international markets occurs against the backdrop of a potential merger with Avianca Holdings. Each company is majority owned by Synergy Aerospace, but operates separately. After completing the evaluation of a potential merger with Avianca Brazil in 2014, Avianca is now reconsidering a potential tie up with the airline amid an ugly shareholder battle over Avianca’s pursuit of a strategic partnership with United.
Finnair and TAP Portugal: their location based long haul niche strategies compared
Both Finnair and TAP are based in peripheral corners of Europe: Finnair in the extreme northeast and TAP in the southwest. Both are based in countries with relatively small populations, but they have developed networks that capitalise on their geographic location to carry connecting traffic from across Europe and elsewhere to long haul destinations in other continents.
TAP's main long haul market is Upper South America (primarily Brazil), but it also has a secondary long haul niche in Africa. Finnair's main long haul market is Northeast Asia, with an additional presence in South and Southeast Asia. Both also operate to the US. On short haul, LCC competition has been a bigger threat to TAP than to Finnair, but cost savings are important to both.
TAP and Finnair have similar traffic volumes, unit costs and average trip lengths. Moreover, both have struggled to generate sustainable profitability. This report compares and contrasts Europe's two leading independent exponents of the location based long haul niche strategy. Both are set to accelerate their long haul growth.