TAP Portugal: will its 2012 annual report help to sell the company?


TAP Portugal’s 2012 annual report, published at the end of Jul-2013, gives food for thought to anyone interested in bidding for Portugal’s national airline.

The bad news is that the group made another net loss, its balance sheet was woefully under-capitalised, with high debt levels and negative equity, and labour productivity was mediocre versus European peers. The Portuguese Government has reiterated its intention to re-launch the privatisation process in 2013.

So how should the Government tell the story to prospective buyers? The good news is that losses narrowed, cash flow improved and net debt fell. Moreover, RASK increased, ex fuel CASK remained under control and labour productivity improved.

Further gains could be made, for example through higher load factors and more headcount reductions and, perhaps, by focusing the long-haul network even more sharply on its Latin American niche. In addition, heavily loss-making non-core businesses should be sold or closed. More time may be necessary to demonstrate progress is being made.

Net loss reduced and operating result turns positive

The TAP Portugal Group improved its net result by EUR46 million in 2012, narrowing its loss to EUR31 million. At the operating result level, it turned a loss of EUR18 million in 2011 to a profit of EUR34 million in 2012. Total operating revenues grew by 8% to EUR2,682 million. While the group saw its net loss narrow, 2012 was its fourth successive year of losses.

TAP Portugal Group revenues and profits: 2011 and 2012

EUR million except where stated




Operating Revenues and Gains

 2,479 2,682   8.2%

Operating Costs and Losses

 2,372 2,528  6.6% 

Operating Net Income




Net Income




The principal operating subsidiary of the group is TAP S.A., which accounted for 91% of group revenues in 2012. TAP S.A. consists of TAP Air Transport, TAP Maintenance and Engineering (Portugal) and TAP Servicos (which provides admin and support services to the group). TAP S.A. does not include the loss-making Brazilian maintenance segment or the ‘Holdings and others’ segment, which is also loss-making. TAP S.A. posted a net profit of EUR21 million, up from EUR3 million in 2011, and has been profitable every year since 2009.

TAP Group and TAP S.A. net result (EUR million): 2008-2012

Air Transport, the biggest segment by revenues, returned to profit

By segment, the biggest contributor to group revenues is Air Transport, with revenues of EUR2.3 billion. It was also the most important contributor to the increase in revenues, although all segments saw an increase in revenues in 2012.

TAP Portugal Group revenues by segment (EUR million): 2011 and 2012

While Air Transport is the major revenue contributor, it is only the number two segment by profit, after Maintenance Portugal. Nevertheless, Air Transport succeeded in turning a loss in 2011 into a profit of EUR21 million in 2012.

In spite of profits in Air Transport and the group’s second and third biggest segments, Duty Free and Maintenance Portugal, the group result was weighed down by heavy losses in the Brazilian Maintenance business and the ‘Holdings and others’ segment. Losses in the Brazilian business were reduced for the second successive year, reflecting a five-year restructuring programme launched in 2010, and TAP expects an acceleration in the improvement in its results in 2013. Nevertheless, the two loss-making segments must surely be candidates for sale or closure in order to increase the group’s appeal to prospective investors. It sold a controlling 50.1% stake in ground-handler Groundforce in 2012.

TAP Portugal Group net income by segment (EUR million): 2011 and 2012

Group balance sheet remains weak in spite of falling debt

The group’s debt position remains high, although the trend remains downwards. Net debt at the end of 2012 was EUR934 million, down from almost EUR1.1 billion at the end of 2011, excluding operating leases. Adjusted net debt fell to around EUR1.4 billion from EUR1.6 billion if operating leases capitalised at eight times annual payments are included. Accumulated losses further weighed on the balance sheet, taking its negative equity of -EUR343 million at the end of 2011 to –EUR381 million at the end of 2012.

TAP Group net debt (EUR million): 2008-2012

The group’s balance sheet weakness was acknowledged in the 2012 annual report by TAP’s Supervisory Board chairman Manuel Pinto Barbosa, when referring to the collapse of the privatisation process: “It is important to highlight the urgency in recapitalising TAP SGPS... In fact, the establishment, in the short term, of a solid capital base is an essential condition for the sustainability and future development of the Company”.

This underlines a tension that may continue to hinder the privatisation process if it re-starts. While TAP seeks fresh capital to repair the balance sheet, to fund future capex and to reduce the annual interest burden on its earnings, the government’s priority is to generate cash for the state coffers.


Fleet expansion was put on hold in 2012 as a result of the privatisation process, so that there was no change to the TAP Group fleet. The TAP fleet totalled 55 aircraft (39 medium-haul and 16 long-haul) with an average age of 11.5 years at the end of 2012. The fleet of subsidiary Portugalia consisted of 16 aircraft.

TAP fleet at Dec-2012

Traffic and load factor gains

TAP Portugal passengers carried (million): 2000 to 2012

TAP’s passenger numbers grew by 4.1% in 2012 to reach 10.2 million, the first time they have exceeded 10 million. TAP’s ASKs grew by 4.1% in 2012, with RPKs up 4.8% and passenger load factor up 0.5 ppts to 76.8%. Traffic has grown in each of the past 10 years, with the exception of 2009. Load factor has improved by 9.8 ppts since 2008, helped by new revenue management systems, but was below the AEA average of 79.1% for 2012. TAP’s load factors are below AEA levels in every region, in particular in the domestic market.

TAP Portugal ASK, RPK (billion) and passenger load factor (%): 2001 to 2012

South Atlantic growth slows

By passenger numbers, Europe was by far TAP’s most important traffic region in 2012, with more than six million passengers. The South Atlantic is its biggest long-haul region, with 1.6 million passengers in 2012. By RPKs, the South Atlantic was TAP’s number one market, accounting for 41% of the total in 2012, although this decreased from 42% in 2011.

TAP’s highest growth region was the North Atlantic, where it saw RPKs up 20%, compared with AEA growth of less than 4%. This followed 30% growth in North Atlantic RPKs in 2011. TAP also outpaced AEA member airlines in Africa (RPK +8% vs AEA 4%) and Europe (+7% vs AEA 4%).

Its South Atlantic RPK growth of less than 2% underperformed against the AEA average of almost 9% in 2012 and was slower than the almost 9% growth enjoyed in this region in 2011. TAP’s cargo traffic (RTK) declined by 8.9%, more rapidly than the AEA fall of 3.4%.

Although traffic growth is constrained by a cap on the fleet pending a resolution to the privatisation process, there was continued growth in the first six months of 2013. TAP’s 1H2013 passenger numbers grew by 4.8% to 4.9 million and load factor gained 2.9 ppts to reach 76.9% (still below AEA levels). African routes saw growth of 6.1% in passenger numbers. TAP expects routes to the Portuguese regions of Madeira and the Azores to return to growth in the second half after passenger numbers fell by 1.7% in the first six months (growth resumed, at 5.3%, in June).

See related report: Europe to Latin America: Why European airlines are practising their samba, salsa, tango and rumba

TAP Portugal passenger traffic by region: 2012

TAP Portugal scheduled passenger traffic (RPK) by region: 2012

Cost growth slower than revenues; labour productivity gains

Operating costs for the group increased by 6% in 2012, less than the 8% growth in revenues, with fuel costs rising by 13% to account for 31% of the total. Excluding fuel, costs grew by 3%. Labour costs fell by 2%, with average headcount for the year down just over 1% to 10,923.

TAP ranks 13 out of 19 European airlines analysed in CAPA’s labour productivity rankings, but it improved in 2012 versus 2011 on key measures. It performs well against the peer group on labour cost per employee, but is weak on ATK per employee and revenue per employee. While the group’s labour productivity levels are diluted by its non-flying, ground-based activities, this analysis points to scope for further headcount reductions.

See related report: European airline labour productivity: CAPA rankings

TAP Portugal Group labour productivity measures





Average headcount




Labour costs EUR million




Labour cost per employee EUR




ATK/ employee

 368 372  1.1% 

Employee cost/ ATK EUR cent

 13.2  12.6


Revenue/employee EUR




Unit revenue growth and unit cost reduction since 2008

The chart below illustrates the development of unit costs and unit revenues of TAP S.A. from 2008 to 2012. TAP managed to pull off the relatively rare feat of both increasing RASK and decreasing CASK between 2008 and 2012. The RASK path has not been a smooth one, with annual increases and decreases in alternating years, but its underlying upward trend suggests a degree of pricing power. Pricing power can be ephemeral and is subject to market conditions, but additional load factor gains would help to push up RASK further and TAP still has room for improvement in this respect.

CASK fell quite dramatically in 2009, mainly due to lower fuel prices that year, and has risen each year since, also due to fuel price changes. CASK ex fuel fell each year, although the trend levelled out in 2012. With higher fuel prices, total CASK was up 2.7% in 2012, just below the 2.9% rise in RASK. This points to the need to refocus on ex fuel unit costs in 2013 in order to resume the downward trend and to be better positioned for any increase in fuel prices or weakening of RASK.

TAP S.A. index of costs per available seat kilometre (CASK) and revenue per available seat kilometre (RASK): 2008 to 2012 (indexed to 2008 = 100)

The ‘Finnair of the South’

Placing TAP on our chart of unit costs (CASK) versus average sector length shows it to sit virtually right on top of Finnair. Like Finnair, it is among the more cost-efficient legacy carriers and has a longer average sector length than most of Europe’s smaller FSCs.

This highlights some parallels between the two carriers. Both are physically located at the outer edge of Europe (Finnair to the North East and TAP to the South West) in small countries. Both have a niche in using their hubs to take European traffic from markets outside their home country to an intercontinental destination market (Asia in the case of Finnair and Latin America for TAP). TAP has more capacity in Europe than does Finnair, but both have similar capacity in their respective major long-haul markets. TAP also has a secondary niche in routes to Africa.

The Finnair Group was profitable in 2012, while TAP continued to post a net loss, and its stock exchange listed status has perhaps given it a greater commercial focus for longer. Finnair also has a much stronger balance sheet than TAP. Moreover, Finnair has been much more aggressive in pursuing its long-haul niche, with 10% growth in RPKs to Asia in 2012 compared with TAP’s growth of less than 2% on the South Atlantic. With strong growth in North America and Africa, TAP may risk spreading itself too thinly on long-haul, while growth in Europe will increase competition with LCCs.

Unit costs (cost per available seat kilometre, EUR cent) and average sector length for selected European legacy and low-cost carriers*: 2012

See related report: TAP Portugal privatisation. Will TAP be back in the shop window soon?

Want More Analysis Like This?

CAPA Membership provides access to all news and analysis on the site, along with access to many areas of our comprehensive databases and toolsets.
Find Out More