Jade Cargo International announced (31-Dec-2011) the temporary suspension of Jade Cargo services "due to overall weak air cargo demand". The carried added the suspension of service will "provide the shareholders with an opportunity to coordinate with stakeholders to continue with the restructuring of the company’s financial structure". The Shenzhen-based carrier is a JV between Lufthansa Cargo (25%), Shenzhen Airlines (51%) and DEG (24%). As a result of the suspension, the carrier's six Boeing 747-400ERFs aircraft have temporarily been grounded. According to reports in Boersen Zeitung, Jade Cargo no longer has the funds to purchase fuel for its six 747 aircraft. As previously reported, Lufthansa Cargo CFO Peter Gerber in mid Dec-2011 stated the carrier was looking for a new Chinese partner for Jade Cargo due to slowing demand growth and excess capacity in the China market (Borsen Zeitung, 16-Dec-2011). Lufthansa Cargo head of sales and marketing Andreas Otto separately stated last month if profit margins at Jade Cargo did not improve, it would not rule out a divestment from the carrier (Air Cargo News, 05-Dec-2011). "We shall withdraw from loss-making units without a reasonable turnaround perspective," he said at the time. The carrier has reportedly held talks with Bank of China and Shenzhen Airlines to agree a capital increase for undercapitalised Jade. Jade Cargo was founded in Oct-2004 with flight operations commencing in Aug-2006. The airline currently has around 390 employees. [more - original PR]
Jade Cargo temporarily halts operations amid weak air cargo demand and shareholder negotiations
You may also be interested in the following articles...
China and Australia remove airline growth restrictions as China cautiously embraces open skies
China has agreed to liberalise passenger flights and remove capacity restrictions with Australia, its largest outbound long haul market after the United States. This is a relief to Chinese airlines, which face bilateral constraints in North America and Europe. The result is already evident as Chinese airlines deploy more capacity and larger aircraft to Australia.
In North American and European markets the local governments hold back on traffic right expansion (let alone open skies). But for Australia it was the Australian government, which signalled some years ago that it wanted to liberalise once China was ready – a time that has now come.
Australia's view was progressive and detached from bygone days of national carrier interest; Chinese airlines hold 90% of the market to Australia. Elsewhere many governments still hold back on Chinese traffic right expansion so their local airlines can continue to grow. There are 15 Chinese airports that have nonstop flights to Australia with a total of 27 airport pairs – figures that should expand in 2017 as the market evolves further with the Virgin Australia-HNA partnership.
Chinese long haul secondary city air routes: BA's Chengdu exit does not reflect the broader market
The fastest long haul airline growth is not occurring with Gulf airlines but rather, with services to and from secondary Chinese cities. It is not a secret that local incentives and subsidies, generally common in any market, are especially large in price and duration for secondary Chinese cities. An airline might expect over a third of revenues to be subsidised. This drastically alters the business case in a low-margin industry, hence the proliferation of secondary city services. This extreme dependence on subsidies raises the question of how long governments are willing to issue generous subsidies, and how many routes can be sustainable without them.
British Airways' decision to exit its only secondary Chinese route to Chengdu, in Jan-2017, might suggest the music is ending and the secondary long haul bubble is popping. There is added colour given the recent UK-China air service agreement expansion, and Brexit/British pound depreciation overhangs.
BA's exit does confirm market fundamentals: secondary city yields are low, and some routes are ahead of their time. Yet a number of factors unique to British Airways suggest caution in concluding that BA's Chengdu exit could foreshadow other withdrawals.