Taiwan President, Ma Yingjeou, is calling for cross-Strait frequencies to increase from 370 flights per week to at least 500 flights per week to be sufficient for the 5 million cross-Strait passenger movements p/a (Global Times, 24-Jun-2010). Mr Ma stated the development outlook for Taiwanese airlines is dependent on cross-Strait business and economic ties. Meanwhile, Mr Ma has called on the expansion of Taipei Songshan Airport to be expedited in order to compete with other airports in the region including Shanghai Hongqiao, Tokyo Haneda and Seoul Gimpo.
Cross-Strait frequencies need to be at least 500: Taiwan President
You may also be interested in the following articles...
Korea-Japan: LCCs are poised to overtake full service airlines for first time in Northeast Asia
For the first time in Northeast Asian aviation, low cost airlines are poised to overtake full service airlines in a significant way. The market concerned is that between Japan and Korea, where LCCs are rapidly growing, while full service airlines are decreasing capacity. Overall market size and visitor figures are at record highs. This refutes any legacy airline thinking that LCCs "steal" market share; LCCs are growing the market and becoming the future – as they already are in other parts in the world.
LCCs accounted for 1% of available seats between Japan and Korea in 2009, reached 37% in 2016, and so far in 2017 will account for 49% of the market. Limited airport data indicates that LCCs, operating at higher load factors, already transport more passengers than full service airlines, and by the end of 2017 LCCs should easily account for the majority of capacity.
LCCs already fly more airport pairs than their full service counterparts. The LCC development between Japan and Korea illustrates underlying LCC opportunity in Northeast Asia but also reflects on the importance of liberalisation, and for full service airlines to have efficient cost bases.
Taiwan's TransAsia Airways collapses, having failed to address changes in Asian aviation
The repeated strategic failures of TransAsia Airways have resulted in the Taiwanese carrier being punished with market exit. Outside the domestic market TransAsia amassed little presence, and its departure will not greatly affect the market. But its collapse is an example for all: TransAsia is an unfortunate example of having failed to address market changes around Asia, and more specifically – needing to evolve out of a small regional full service airline.
There will undoubtedly be a superficial narrative that TransAsia struggled to recover from two tragic fatal accidents. But as at Malaysia Airlines, TransAsia's underlying problems existed before the crashes. Unlike Malaysia Airlines, TransAsia did not move fast enough to get its house in order.