Delta Air Lines wholly-owned subsidiary, Monroe Energy LLC, has reached (30-Apr-2012) an agreement with Phillips 66 to acquire the Trainer refinery complex south of Philadelphia. As part of the transaction, Monroe will enter into strategic sourcing and marketing agreements with BP and Phillips 66. The acquisition includes pipelines and transportation assets that will provide access to the delivery network for jet fuel reaching Delta's operations throughout the Northeast, including its hubs at New York LaGuardia and John F Kennedy International airports. After receipt of USD30 million in state government assistance for job creation and infrastructure improvement from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Monroe's investment to acquire the refinery will be USD150 million, and Monroe will invest USD100 million to convert the existing infrastructure to maximise jet fuel production. Production at the refinery combined with multi-year agreements to exchange gasoline, diesel, and other refined products from the refinery for jet fuel will provide 80% of Delta's jet fuel needs in the US. Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said (30-Apr-2012) that its ratings and outlook on Delta Air Lines Inc (B/Stable/--) are not affected by the company's plan. [more - original PR]
Delta subsidiary, Monroe Energy LLC, to acquire Trainer refinery complex
You may also be interested in the following articles...
Logic dictates approval of Alaska-Virgin America merger; anti-trust hawks loom large
A pushback in the closing date of the merger of Alaska Air Group and Virgin America – to allow the US government more time for its review of the transaction – created some jitters among investors about the eventual approval of the tie-up, evidenced by a drop in Virgin America’s stock price, which had soared after the deal was tabled in Apr-2016.
Despite the extra time regulators are taking to review the merger, a full-blown rejection of the deal is unlikely given the drastically smaller scope created by Alaska and Virgin America. Indeed, the combined airline creates a more viable entity to compete with the mega-carriers created by previous mergers; not a threat to consumer choice.
Close scrutiny by US regulators was always expected, as are some form of concessions in order for the agreement to ultimately gain the government’s approval. The form those concessions could take has spurred significant speculation from slot divestitures to the relinquishment of gates. Perhaps the key for Alaska is ensuring that the composition of those concessions does not compromise the economics of the transaction.
Allegiant Air attacks United in New York, testing niche ULCC model in large competitive metro market
The US ULCC Allegiant Air is stepping outside its typical network framework during late 2016 when it adds service from Newark Liberty International airport, a major hub for United Airlines. Newark, which caters to business and leisure travellers in the New York metro area, is not the typical large city market that Allegiant usually enters. With a few exceptions, Allegiant’s larger markets are heavily weighted toward leisure travellers; its top bases are Orlando Sanford and Las Vegas McCarran.
Allegiant is breaking United’s monopoly on three of four routes that it is adding from Newark, challenging United to find ways to respond to the new competition. But Allegiant’s operating profile is different from that of typical ULCCs, which means that United may not be forced to craft any response to Allegiant’s small presence in Newark by YE2016.
Allegiant’s decision to enter the New York market was driven by an opportunity emerging after US regulators eased operating restrictions at Newark. It is an easy, low-risk way for Allegiant to test the waters in larger markets while largely sticking to its niche formula of linking small to medium-sized cities to large leisure destinations.