Loading

US-Gulf airline dispute - Europe Part 2: market share in dispute. Does anyone "own" the passenger?

Analysis

This is Part 2 of a report reviewing European airline comments filed in the US-Gulf airline dispute. This instalment examines AF-KLM and Lufthansa's supposed claims of damage from Gulf carriers: a long list of statistics about market share and closed destinations. Some imagination has been applied here. For example Lufthansa attributes its 1995 exit from the Sydney route on Gulf carriers- despite the first Gulf carrier not arriving in Australia until 1996; Lufthansa and Swiss cite closed destinations ranging from Busan to Monastir despite their not having service from the Gulf airlnes.

AF-KLM notes Gulf carriers have gained market share in Europe, but AF-KLM fails to note its own internal cost challenges, along with the impact of LCCs, that have seen it decline in parts of the world while IAG and Lufthansa grow. AF-KLM argues it suffered damage from two fewer Bangkok frequencies - despite KLM's up-gauging which produced 12% growth for the group. Lufthansa says "there is no evidence that the Gulf carriers meaningfully stimulate market growth". But Western European visitors to Bangkok are up 9.6% partially due to Gulf carriers, which are also stimulating growth from Africa and the Middle East.

Read More

This CAPA Analysis Report is 4,884 words.

You must log in to read the rest of this article.

Got an account? Log In

Create a CAPA Account

Get a taste of our expert analysis and research publications by signing up to CAPA Content Lite for free, or unlock full access with CAPA Membership.

InclusionsContent Lite UserCAPA Member
News
Non-Premium Analysis
Premium Analysis
Data Centre
Selected Research Publications

Want More Analysis Like This?

CAPA Membership provides access to all news and analysis on the site, along with access to many areas of our comprehensive databases and toolsets.
Find Out More