Virgin Group chairman Sir Richard Branson stated (15-Apr-2013) "size doesn't equate to quality". He lamented "the competition authorities, in their wisdom, have allowed the six biggest airlines in America to become three giant airlines - and among the biggest in the world". He noted: "The real advantage these big airlines have is their sheer market dominance, and they often use it to get rid of their smaller rivals using questionable tactics. Virgin America is the only airline started since JetBlue in February 2000 that is still in business. They have all been driven to the wall. What's more, no other new startup airlines are in the pipeline because of the lack of investors willing to enter the current anti-competitive environment". He noted challenges with access for smaller operators, using access to Newark Airport an an example. He explained: "For five years we were told there were no slots available for us to get into the airport and operate. In fact, the incumbent airlines managed to “squat” on capacity to keep competition out of Newark alone. The Newark-San Francisco flights were only operated by one carrier - a monopoly route that had some of the highest fares in the US as a result. When American Airlines went into Chapter 11 a few slots became available. Virgin America entered the market and fares from Newark to California dropped by 40% and suddenly consumers had better options with new planes, in-flight WiFi and exemplary service. But instead of competing based on quality, United then conjured up a whole batch of previously "non-existent" slots to double their capacity on San Francisco-New York and Los Angeles-New York flights to try to squeeze Virgin America out. They have been playing this game against Virgin America by putting on extra capacity on our other routes at a massive loss to themselves. My estimate is that the extra capacity out of Newark will cost them USD130 million per year - just to try to drive us out of the marketplace". He also requested the Department of Transportation to "consider looking into what United has been up to these past couple of years and consider taking appropriate action". [more - original PR]
Sir Richard Branson laments outcome of consolidation in US aviation sector
You may also be interested in the following articles...
Logic dictates approval of Alaska-Virgin America merger; anti-trust hawks loom large
A pushback in the closing date of the merger of Alaska Air Group and Virgin America – to allow the US government more time for its review of the transaction – created some jitters among investors about the eventual approval of the tie-up, evidenced by a drop in Virgin America’s stock price, which had soared after the deal was tabled in Apr-2016.
Despite the extra time regulators are taking to review the merger, a full-blown rejection of the deal is unlikely given the drastically smaller scope created by Alaska and Virgin America. Indeed, the combined airline creates a more viable entity to compete with the mega-carriers created by previous mergers; not a threat to consumer choice.
Close scrutiny by US regulators was always expected, as are some form of concessions in order for the agreement to ultimately gain the government’s approval. The form those concessions could take has spurred significant speculation from slot divestitures to the relinquishment of gates. Perhaps the key for Alaska is ensuring that the composition of those concessions does not compromise the economics of the transaction.
Fuel helps US low cost airline CASK performance; Southwest's labour costs have grown 17.5% y-o-y
Significantly lower fuel costs were a major driver in the outcome of the four main US low cost airlines – Southwest, jetBlue, Alaska and Virgin America – posting significantly lower unit costs year-on-year in 2015. According to CAPA’s CASK database, most of those airlines posted double-digit decreases as the average decrease in top-line fuel expense among those airlines was 31% year-on-year.
Most of those airlines should continue to record a favourable unit cost performance in 2016 as fuel costs, while rising, will remain below historic highs. Southwest, which has recently forged a new contract agreement in principle with its pilots after years of long and tense negotiations, may need to refine its current cost forecast if the deal is ratified. jetBlue has revised its cost forecast downward slightly during 2016, while Alaska on a stand-alone basis should continue to post a solid cost performance.
Over the course of the next one to two years Southwest is likely to ratify agreements with three of its major labour groups – pilots, flight attendants and mechanics. If the pay raises in the tentative pilot deal are an indication of salary increases for other work groups, Southwest is likely to find itself outside the cost boundaries of a traditional low cost airline.