American Eagle plans to change its name and logo, with the changes expected to be unveiled in the next few weeks. Eagle president Pedro Fábregas, in a message to employees, stated (Jan-2014) the changes are expected “to distinguish ourselves” from other regional carriers. The message outlined, "American Eagle Airlines experienced a year of change in 2013. Executive Airlines ceased flying operations as we returned the last of our turboprop fleet. American Airlines began rebranding our aircraft in a new livery for the first time since the inception of the Eagle brand, meanwhile, additional regional carriers began flying under the American Eagle brand. Our corporate parent, AMR Corporation, merged with US Airways Group and emerged from bankruptcy to form American Airlines Group. I could list more changes, but the point has been made – there was a lot of change for our company and our people. Looking forward to 2014, there will be both change and opportunity. We will soon unveil a new name and identity for our company. This will allow us to distinguish ourselves from the other American Eagle-branded carriers, with our own name and culture. I am excited to share this with you in the next few weeks. American Eagle will still be the regional brand of American Airlines, just like Delta Connection or United Express". He also said the carrier will sign a new labour contract with its pilots. Mr Fábregas said, "We are in talks with ALPA, the union that represents our pilots at Eagle, about changes to their contract. If Eagle is able to reach an agreement with ALPA, it will put our airline on a sure path to competitiveness with other regional carriers and guarantee us 60 new Embraer 175 aircraft beginning in 2015. Cost competitiveness also will make us a legitimate contender for any future American option aircraft. American has secured a similar arrangement from US Airways subsidiary PSA, and Delta has a similar arrangement with its wholly owned subsidiary, Endeavor. On Jan 2, Eagle’s pilot leadership, the ALPA Master Executive Council (MEC) will decide if and how to formally respond to the company’s proposal. The company, for its part, has scheduled negotiations to take place between Jan. 3 and Jan. 10. If a Tentative Agreement (TA) has been reached between Eagle and our pilots by Jan. 10, it will be announced that Eagle will be getting the E175s, pending a successful outcome of a ratification vote. If there is no TA by that date, American’s management team will start considering other options with respect to cost-competitive placement of the E175 aircraft".
American Eagle plans to change its name and logo, sign a new labour contract with its pilots
You may also be interested in the following articles...
Turbulence at Virgin Australia: Some winners, some changes. Virgin's share register revolving door
The past month has been, as the Chinese might say, an interesting time for Virgin Australia. Two major new Chinese shareholders, HNA and Nanshan Group, an aggravated departure by one shareholder and now the announcement of a major restructuring, delivered to an unsuspecting world at 30 minutes’ notice, seemingly leaving behind its (previously) largest shareholder, Etihad – this has all occurred in a blur.
A financial restructuring has been in the wind for some time, but there was little to explain the breathless announcement of a one-for-one share issue on 15-Jun-2016. This involves a fully underwritten AUD852 million equity raising; together with a previously announced proposed AUD159 million placement to HNA Innovation, the total amount raised will slightly exceed AUD1 billion.
It sounds like good news for a cash-strapped Virgin Australia, but working out the winners and losers is more challenging as the dust settles.
Norwegian Air's NAI awaits final approval of US rights. Credibility of US-EU open skies is at stake
All objections and further comments on the tentative grant of a US foreign air carrier permit to Norwegian's Irish subsidiary Norwegian Air International (NAI) by the Department of Transportation (DoT), on 15-Apr-2015, have now been made. Not surprisingly, a number of labour organisations and some US senators filed to reiterate their opposition. Many supportive comments were also received.
The opponents' central contention is that NAI's business model contravenes the US-EU open skies agreement's Article 17 bis, aimed at upholding labour standards. This is merely a retread of the argument rejected by the legal counsels of the DoT and the US State Department, and by the Office of Legal Counsel. Some also repeat the unfounded claim that NAI poses a threat to safety. Both positions forget that NAI's employment and safety regulations are those of Ireland, an EU nation. They also forget that NAI will create new jobs in the US and EU.
It would be remarkable if the DoT were to reverse its tentative approval, reached after more than two years of deliberation. The US-EU agreement was designed to stimulate competition, to the benefit of consumers. Approval for NAI is essential to its ongoing credibility. A final decision now awaits.