JetBlue CEO David Barger, at CAPA’s Airlines in Transition conference in Dublin said (11-Apr-2013) of the US Government’s implementation of the 9/11 security tax, “It’s rude.” Mr Barger elaborated that the airline industry was attacked during the terrorist events of 11-Sep-2001 but has been taxed from it in order to help the US government reduce its deficit and not use the tax to benefit aviation, such as improve air traffic management. Regulators “keep milking this industry”, Mr Barger said.
AIT Dublin: 9/11 security tax is ‘rude’: JetBlue
You may also be interested in the following articles...
US airlines and the Cuba route awards Part 1: The US DoT slices up many pieces of the Havana pie
US regulators have decided to spread Havana award rights among eight operators – a mix of global full service airlines, medium frills low cost carriers and ULCCs. Unsurprisingly, given the concentration of Cuban Americans residing in the region, South Florida features prominently in the tentative award approvals.
In theory, the DoT’s proposed route structure ensures that customers travelling to Havana have access to a wider range of fare prices and product offerings. In many respects the agency had little choice but to accommodate as many airlines as possible for service to Havana – in order to ensure that consumers had an array of service providers as scheduled air service resumes between the US and Cuba.
There may be some quibbles regarding the tentative route awards to Havana, but the route composition proposed by the DoT is not likely to change drastically. The agency’s route dispersal reflects certain expectations that the agency would institute a certain level of competitive diversity on new services to Havana.
(This is Part 1 in a series examining US-Cuba route awards. Part 2 will examine markets other than Havana)
Alaska, jetBlue and Southwest cost projections; good in the short term but long term challenges loom
Just as the large three global US airlines – American, Delta and United – work to contain their unit costs, their rivals Alaska, jetBlue and Southwest are committed to keeping their respective unit costs in line as the current revenue environment in the US remains weak.
The latter three airlines face different cost dynamics in the future. Alaska is attempting to embark on a merger with Virgin America, which will inevitably create some cost pressure as the full integration gets under way. Southwest is in the middle of complex pilot and flight attendant negotiations, which makes predicting its cost performance in the near- to mid-term difficult. At some point jetBlue will also conclude a new pilot contract that will affect its cost structure.
Cost performance results for Alaska, jetBlue and Southwest for 2Q2016 and the full year look reasonably favourable, although Alaska has refined its 2016 targets slightly, driven in part by increases in performance-based pay. But its costs should remain competitive compared with its peers, and solidly lower than those of the larger network carriers.