JetBlue Airways confirmed (05-Aug-2013) the addition of lie-flat premium seating on its transcontinental routes from 2014. The carrier expects to launch the seats on its A321 fleet from 2Q2014, increasing frequency on routes from New York JFK to Los Angeles and San Francisco. The carrier's first four A321s, set to be delivered from late 2013, will feature 190 economy seats only. A321s delivered from early 2014 will feature 16 of the lie-flat seats and 143 economy seats. The seats, provided by Thompson Aero Seating, will be in a 2-2 and 1-1 configuration, with rows one, three and five to offer 2-by-2 seating, and rows two and four to offer private suites, with one seat on each side of the aisle. The seats will offer adjustable firmness, a massage function, a 15-inch widescreen and a 'wake-me-for-service' indicator. The carrier will also refresh the economy cabin, with moveable headrests and a new IFE system on 10.1 inch widescreens. JetBlue Airways CEO Dave Barger said: "Our customers have requested more premium options on our transcontinental flights and we listened. We decided to enter the premium transcontinental market in a way that only JetBlue can: with an intense focus on offering the best possible product for the best possible price. Transcontinental routes have had high premium fares we believe we can beat. By offering our own, unique seats and enriched service elements that will include some soon-to-be-announced partnerships, we are creating a one-of-a-kind experience that will serve this market in a way only JetBlue can." [more - original PR]
JetBlue Airways confirms addition of lie-flat premium seating on transcontinenatal services
You may also be interested in the following articles...
Singapore Airlines and United Airlines codeshare. JV on Singapore-US nonstops would make sense
The evolving Singapore Airlines (SIA) partnership strategy has reached another milestone with a new codeshare agreement with United Airlines. While SIA and United are longstanding members of the Star Alliance, their relationship has never been close and involved any codesharing.
SIA and United stated in a 9-May-2016 application with the US Department of Transportation they intend to start codesharing on 1-Jul-2016. Initially the codeshare includes eight United-operated domestic routes beyond Houston. However, the two airlines are seeking blanket codeshare approval, which would enable potential future extensions to cover United-operated flights beyond SIA’s other US gateways, SIA-operated flights beyond Singapore and their flights in the US-Singapore market.
United is launching non-stop flights to Singapore in Jun-2016 while SIA is planning to resume non-stop flights to the US in 2018. United and SIA are fierce competitors across the Pacific but the new codeshare could open the door to a broader and potentially game changing partnership. SIA has been actively seeking new or enhanced partnerships, an initiative that has already resulted in new joint ventures with Star members Air New Zealand and Lufthansa.
Logic dictates approval of Alaska-Virgin America merger; anti-trust hawks loom large
A pushback in the closing date of the merger of Alaska Air Group and Virgin America – to allow the US government more time for its review of the transaction – created some jitters among investors about the eventual approval of the tie-up, evidenced by a drop in Virgin America’s stock price, which had soared after the deal was tabled in Apr-2016.
Despite the extra time regulators are taking to review the merger, a full-blown rejection of the deal is unlikely given the drastically smaller scope created by Alaska and Virgin America. Indeed, the combined airline creates a more viable entity to compete with the mega-carriers created by previous mergers; not a threat to consumer choice.
Close scrutiny by US regulators was always expected, as are some form of concessions in order for the agreement to ultimately gain the government’s approval. The form those concessions could take has spurred significant speculation from slot divestitures to the relinquishment of gates. Perhaps the key for Alaska is ensuring that the composition of those concessions does not compromise the economics of the transaction.