Cathay Pacific CEO John Slosar, in CX World Magazine Nov-2012, stated (Nov-2012) on the cost side, the biggest issue for the carrier is fuel, which is the carrier's single largest cost. He commented, "We planned for fuel to be expensive this year, but it has been even more expensive than we anticipated. The actual cost of fuel into plane...has exceeded budget by about 6%." He continued: "6% may not seem like much but, looking at all our flights together on an annual basis, if we had done nothing, this higher fuel price would have meant our total fuel bill this year would have exceeded the high budget we had planned by HK$2.5 billion! The increase in the price of fuel since 2010 has had a big impact on the operating cost of our routes." Using a specific example, Mr Slosar said: "On a 747-400 flight to London, fuel today represents 62.5% of the total cost of the flight. In 2010, when fuel was substantially lower, it represented only 47.9%. That is a big jump! Let me try to put that into perspective. Taken over a year, on that one flight pair alone, the fuel bill will have increased by HK$110 million – again, on just this one flight pair". He said the carrier has limited options to directly address the fuel situation. While the carrier hedges fuel, "hedging is not a miracle solution, particularly when fuel prices have been stubbornly high for so long". He also noted it is difficult to raise fares in the current weak economic environment. On fuel surcharges, he commented: "We are allowed to collect fuel surcharges, but these require regulatory approval and help us recover only about 50% of the extra fuel cost we pay. So this also helps, but cannot fill the gap." Mr Slosar said the carrier has been the most aggressive in taking steps to reduce fuel consumption with the retiring of Boeing 747s from its fleet and replacing them with 777-300ERs being key to this. He noted, "The 777s are overall more than 20% more fuel efficient than the 747-400s. As we move into 2013 and take delivery of more 777-300ERs, we’ll see an even bigger benefit but the full benefit will not be realized until 2014." Mr Slosar said fuel costs are not the only cost issue facing the carrier, adding, "There is significant cost pressure all around us. We are seeing increases in airport charges, overflight charges, catering charges, landing and parking charges, handling charges and passenger costs to name a few". [more - original PR]
Cathay Pacific notes significant increases in cost-base, fuel costs in 2012 exceeding budget by 6%
You may also be interested in the following articles...
Cathay Pacific's difficult 2016: hedging loss, growth cuts, A350 delay, unions, 10 abreast response
Asia's flag airlines are a stately bunch. They have generally avoided the major public upsets of European and American peers while state or family/conglomerate ownership grants a long term mindset, and their renowned service casts a public halo. Cathay Pacific especially strives for continuity. Thus it is an upset when, as now, prospects for the year shift.
2016 was to be notable for Cathay, financially and strategically. Cathay expected further benefit from fuel as it came off hedges. Delivery of its first 12 A350s were to open new routes, restore frequencies and right size capacity. This has changed – but not because of the Chinese economy, as some will be quick to speculate. The continuing decline in fuel prices has likely seen Cathay's unrealised hedging losses increase (to approximately USD1 billion) with much to become realised losses. This is in an environment where mainland Chinese carriers are unhedged and other competitors have shorter hedging obligations, disadvantaging Cathay in an over capacity market.
Growth is expected to be cut owing to a further A350 delivery delay and pilot union "contract compliance" that greatly reduces flexibility and the ability to train new pilots, limiting expansion. These new challenges add to existing concerns over weak passenger and cargo yields, and a falling stock price.
Further integration with wholly owned Dragonair is still planned (possibly with a re-branding) while finally moving to 10 abreast 777 economy seating reduces unit costs but invites an unwelcome response from passengers.
Clouds loom over Cross-Strait airline market as Taiwan faces political change. Hong Kong may benefit
The ruling, and pro-Beijing, KMT party is expected to lose the Jan-2016 elections in Taiwan. Under the KMT's leadership Beijing and Taipei have forged closer ties, including the launch of charter and then scheduled Cross-Strait flights between mainland China and Taiwan, which had been prohibited for decades. There has been growth, with increase in overall frequency as well as destinations available to be served in the still tightly-regulated market.
An outstanding gripe from the Taiwanese side was that, for complex reasons, their airlines were not permitted to carry transfer traffic from mainland China to Taiwan and beyond to other markets – such as Australia and North America, two popular long haul markets from mainland China and for which Taiwan is well positioned to be a hub. Earlier in 2015 when relations were warmer, Taiwanese carriers were expected to receive transfer traffic rights by the end of the year. But as the Taiwanese political situation has turned unfavourable to Beijing, an Oct-2015 meeting did not grant transfer traffic rights. The bigger risk is that cooling relations would slow Cross-Strait liberalisation – or at an extreme, recede. One outcome could be that visitor growth would instead funnel through the Hong Kong hub.