could reduce cost efficiencies and result in confusion and inconvenience for
said. "For Bangkok to be a strong aviation hub in the region, the long-term
vision should still be to have a single airport operation," said Albert
Tjoeng, a Singapore-based spokesman for the global airline industry group.
"Two airports will split passengers, airlines, the AOT's resources and will lead to lower cost-efficiency and inconvenience for passengers," Tjoeng said.
The Thai government opted yesterday to re-open the nearly century-old Don Munag airport to allow a host of problems at the sparkling new Suvarnabhumi Airport to be fixed, catching the aviation industry by surprise. The government said the old airport will be reopened to allow more than 100 cracks on runways and taxiways to be repaired at Suvarnabhumi, as well as ease traffic congestion at the new airport.
The 3 bln usd Suvarnabhumi Airport has been mired in problems since opening, including embarrassing cracks, corruption claims, inadequate toilets and complaints about hygiene standards.
Thai AirAsia, the country's largest budget carrier, said the government should do more to clarify problems at Suvarnabhumi.
"Authorities have to speed up restoring confidence in the international aviation community," the airline's chief executive Tassapon Bijleveld said.
An aviation industry source in Singapore said the government's decision to re-open Don Muang might have been motivated by political factors rather than safety concerns.
"The current military regime is doing everything it can to discredit the Thaksin era," the source said, referring to former premier Thaksin Shinawatra, who was ousted by the military in a bloodless coup in September.
Suvarnabhumi was one of Thaksin's pet projects. The deposed premier made the airport project a personal crusade, once camping at the building site in a show of support.
"One way of discrediting the Thaksin regime is by showing his big, pet project, Suvarnabhumi Airport, was wrecked not only by corruption but also incompetence," the source said.
Meanwhile, the Airlines Operator Committee, which groups 68 foreign airlines in Bangkok, said it opposes the re-opening of Don Muang.
"Our standpoint is that operating a single airport at Suvarnabhumi is the best thing. If Suvarnabhumi is already congested, we should utilize the existing facilities," said Sopin Daengteth, the committee's chairperson.
Suvarnabhumi has capacity of 45 mln passengers per year. Sopin said the committee believes that the one airport was enough. "There is no need for Bangkok to have two airports which are just 20 kilometers away from each other," she said.
Richard Pinkham, a Singapore-based aviation analyst at the Center for Asia Pacific Aviation, said it could create problems for passengers but argued the two airports could be better for Thailand's air traffic in the end. "In the short-term, it does cause confusion for sure, but in the longer-term, the initial confusion will be a small price to pay for more capacity," Pinkham said. "With current rates of growth, it won't be too long before brand-new Suvarnabhumi is overburdened," he said.
But Anek Srishevachart, president of the Association of Thai Travel Agents, said he is worried that confusion arising from having two international airports could dent growth in the tourism industry. "It is not the right decision made by the government," Anek said, adding that the government should have consulted airline and tourism executives first.
"Having the dual international airports would create great inconvenience and confusion for airlines, travel agents and tourists. The impact on tourism from such a policy will be very huge," he said.
Want more analysis like this? CAPA Membership gives you access to all news and analysis on the site, along with access to many areas of our comprehensive databases and toolsets.
Find out more and take a free trial.