Qantas will be forced to increase airfares to Europe from Jan-2012 after the European Union penalised the airline because Australia currently lacks a price on greenhouse gas emissions (AAP, Sydney Morning Herald, 14-May-2011). The aviation industry will be included in the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme from 01-Jan-2011 and under changes made to the scheme, Qantas would be required to pay a tax on 15% of its carbon emissions from its nearest port of call, the airline claims. A Qantas spokesperson said the airline is likely to be hit twice on services to the UK, owing to Air Passenger Duty. The EU charge would be levied on the airline's last port of departure, which in Qantas' case would be usually be Bangkok, Singapore or Hong Kong. Qantas operates to London Heathrow and Frankfurt in the European Union. US airlines will also face the EU carbon impost and are likely to challenge its validity in the World Trade Organisation (The Australian, 14-May-2011).
Qantas fined by EU due to lack of carbon price in Australia
You may also be interested in the following articles...
Australia and New Zealand hit highs in 2016, but 2017 will lose a little lustre
Australia and New Zealand enter 2017 on a different level from 12 months previously. The biggest change, not just compared to 2016 but since the global financial crisis, is that Qantas is revelling in a successful turnaround.
Finnair and TAP Portugal: their location based long haul niche strategies compared
Both Finnair and TAP are based in peripheral corners of Europe: Finnair in the extreme northeast and TAP in the southwest. Both are based in countries with relatively small populations, but they have developed networks that capitalise on their geographic location to carry connecting traffic from across Europe and elsewhere to long haul destinations in other continents.
TAP's main long haul market is Upper South America (primarily Brazil), but it also has a secondary long haul niche in Africa. Finnair's main long haul market is Northeast Asia, with an additional presence in South and Southeast Asia. Both also operate to the US. On short haul, LCC competition has been a bigger threat to TAP than to Finnair, but cost savings are important to both.
TAP and Finnair have similar traffic volumes, unit costs and average trip lengths. Moreover, both have struggled to generate sustainable profitability. This report compares and contrasts Europe's two leading independent exponents of the location based long haul niche strategy. Both are set to accelerate their long haul growth.