Finnair lowered (13-Nov-2013) its financial guidance for 2013, due to the expected impact of a strike by the Finnish Flight Attendants' Association (SLSY) and The Finnish Aviation Union (IAU), which will take place between 15-Nov-2013 and 23-Nov-2013, as well as between 27-Nov-2013 and 30-Nov-2013. The carrier expects each strike day will decrease turnover by EUR4.5 million, with the strike to result in a direct revenue loss of EUR60 million and direct operating loss of EUR30 million if carried out to the full extent. The estimates do not include the potential impact of the strike on sales. Finnair stated: "The weak visibility of air traffic development continues due to the uncertain economic outlook in Europe and slower growth in Asia. Fuel costs are expected to remain high in the last quarter of 2013, and the demand for air traffic is estimated to grow moderately. Due to the preparations already made for the possible strikes of SLSY and IAU, Finnair’s turnover will be below the 2012 level and its operational result for 2013 will turn to a loss. If the strikes are carried out to the extent threatened, they will result in further direct revenue losses of at least EUR60 million and decrease Finnair’s operating result by at least EUR30 million. In addition, unit costs excluding fuel (CASK excl. fuel) will increase from 2012. If the strikes are avoided, unit costs excluding fuel are expected to decrease compared to 2012." Finnair added: "The labour agreement negotiations are still on going and Finnair hopes that an agreement is reached to avoid the strike." As previously reported by CAPA, the carrier initially lowered its 2013 guidance on 24-Oct-2013. [more - original PR]
Finnair lowers financial guidance due to expected impact of strike
You may also be interested in the following articles...
Finnair and TAP Portugal: their location based long haul niche strategies compared
Both Finnair and TAP are based in peripheral corners of Europe: Finnair in the extreme northeast and TAP in the southwest. Both are based in countries with relatively small populations, but they have developed networks that capitalise on their geographic location to carry connecting traffic from across Europe and elsewhere to long haul destinations in other continents.
TAP's main long haul market is Upper South America (primarily Brazil), but it also has a secondary long haul niche in Africa. Finnair's main long haul market is Northeast Asia, with an additional presence in South and Southeast Asia. Both also operate to the US. On short haul, LCC competition has been a bigger threat to TAP than to Finnair, but cost savings are important to both.
TAP and Finnair have similar traffic volumes, unit costs and average trip lengths. Moreover, both have struggled to generate sustainable profitability. This report compares and contrasts Europe's two leading independent exponents of the location based long haul niche strategy. Both are set to accelerate their long haul growth.
Finnair accelerates capacity growth, led by long haul; seeks cost efficiency through fleet & labour
In 2016 Finnair accelerated its rate of capacity growth after a modest return to expansion in 2015, following cuts in 2014. It also experienced a fall in unit revenue (as did most European airlines), most notably in the regions of highest capacity growth, i.e. the long haul markets North America and Asia.
Asia is Finnair's most important long haul market (Japan and China are its two biggest markets by ASKs) and its ranking by seats on routes between European and NE/SE Asia is disproportionate. It has ambitious growth plans in the region and will increase frequencies to Tokyo and Hong Kong this summer. Its long haul network, which will also extend to San Francisco this summer and Goa next winter, is largely founded on connecting traffic via its Helsinki hub.
Finnair's return to capacity growth has coincided with a return to profit, but lower fuel prices were the main driver of its bottom line improvement. Its profit margins remain slim and, beyond the vagaries of fuel price benefits, Finnair aims for more sustainable unit cost cuts. Fleet strategy and labour productivity form a two pronged attack on its cost base.