Cathay Pacific CEO John Slosar, in CX World Magazine Nov-2012, stated (Nov-2012) on the cost side, the biggest issue for the carrier is fuel, which is the carrier's single largest cost. He commented, "We planned for fuel to be expensive this year, but it has been even more expensive than we anticipated. The actual cost of fuel into plane...has exceeded budget by about 6%." He continued: "6% may not seem like much but, looking at all our flights together on an annual basis, if we had done nothing, this higher fuel price would have meant our total fuel bill this year would have exceeded the high budget we had planned by HK$2.5 billion! The increase in the price of fuel since 2010 has had a big impact on the operating cost of our routes." Using a specific example, Mr Slosar said: "On a 747-400 flight to London, fuel today represents 62.5% of the total cost of the flight. In 2010, when fuel was substantially lower, it represented only 47.9%. That is a big jump! Let me try to put that into perspective. Taken over a year, on that one flight pair alone, the fuel bill will have increased by HK$110 million – again, on just this one flight pair". He said the carrier has limited options to directly address the fuel situation. While the carrier hedges fuel, "hedging is not a miracle solution, particularly when fuel prices have been stubbornly high for so long". He also noted it is difficult to raise fares in the current weak economic environment. On fuel surcharges, he commented: "We are allowed to collect fuel surcharges, but these require regulatory approval and help us recover only about 50% of the extra fuel cost we pay. So this also helps, but cannot fill the gap." Mr Slosar said the carrier has been the most aggressive in taking steps to reduce fuel consumption with the retiring of Boeing 747s from its fleet and replacing them with 777-300ERs being key to this. He noted, "The 777s are overall more than 20% more fuel efficient than the 747-400s. As we move into 2013 and take delivery of more 777-300ERs, we’ll see an even bigger benefit but the full benefit will not be realized until 2014." Mr Slosar said fuel costs are not the only cost issue facing the carrier, adding, "There is significant cost pressure all around us. We are seeing increases in airport charges, overflight charges, catering charges, landing and parking charges, handling charges and passenger costs to name a few". [more - original PR]
Cathay Pacific notes significant increases in cost-base, fuel costs in 2012 exceeding budget by 6%
You may also be interested in the following articles...
Cathay Pacific to Christchurch: contentious Air New Zealand JV as Cathay seeks greater "agility"
As Cathay Pacific is being forced to undergo a competitive metamorphosis it is exploring all options. The latest example is an expected announcement of a new Cathay Pacific route from Hong Kong to Christchurch in New Zealand's South Island. The service is expected to be seasonal (for the New Zealand summer), and is only Cathay's second seasonal long haul route after the Jan-2017 announcement of northern summer service to Barcelona.
New Zealand is a small network component for Cathay but one of its last strongholds, due to a joint venture with Air New Zealand. The New Zealand government reluctantly extended approval for the JV despite Cathay and Air NZ reneging on an offer to use it to link Hong Kong with Christchurch, as well as Auckland. This would thereby have extended the JV to benefit more of New Zealand – a sensitive local matter based on the assertion that Auckland was receiving disproportionate air service benefit.
Air NZ's JV with Cathay arch rival Singapore Airlines has resulted in SIA growing its presence in Christchurch. Cathay has been more frugal, and the NZ government determined that although the JV reduced competition, there was no prospective third competitor, so no harm done.
But now that Hong Kong Airlines has entered Auckland, and then expanded, the Cathay-Air NZ JV faces disbanding. By finally committing to a Christchurch route Cathay appears to be bidding to keep the JV in play. But the New Zealand government will still probably withdraw approval of the Air NZ-Cathay JV.
Hong Kong Airlines becomes larger in Japan than in China: overlap with sister HK Express
The rapid growth of mainland China's HNA Group is resulting in companies being added ahead of integration. HNA's two Hong Kong-based airlines, Hong Kong Airlines and HK Express, are increasingly overlapping with each other. That their roles are undefined and uncoordinated risks the two fighting each other – rather than combining their different propositions to address multiple segments of the markets.
Hong Kong Airlines is rapidly growing in Tokyo and Osaka, and launching a new service to Seoul Incheon – its 11th new destination in 2016. These are strong O&D markets and present a change from Hong Kong Airlines' previous staple of connecting traffic from mainland China over Hong Kong, or competing mainly against Cathay Pacific in key regional Asian markets from Hong Kong.
Following Hong Kong Airlines' entry to Tokyo and Osaka it will further increase services to the point where Japan becomes a larger market for it than mainland China. This is of some concern given Hong Kong Airlines' still evolving strategy for Japan, and weakening of the market through the appreciation of the yen.