UK's BAA stated (20-Aug-2012) having "carefully considered" the Court of Appeal’s recent ruling, BAA has decided not to appeal to the Supreme Court and is now proceeding with the sale of London Stansted Airport. BAA said, "We still believe that the Competition Commission ruling fails to recognise that Stansted and Heathrow serve different markets." The decision marks the end to a three-year long dispute on the matter. Stansted Airport is London’s third busiest airport and the UK’s fourth busiest airport. Approximately 17.5 million passengers and 133,500 flights pass through Stansted p/a. 16 airlines operate from Stansted, serving more than 150 destinations in 32 countries. The sale of Stansted will leave BAA with four airports: London Heathrow, Southampton, Aberdeen and Glasgow. Ryanair welcomed the move, stating, "The sale of Stansted into separate ownership will lead to more competition, lower passenger charges, improved passenger services and the roll out of additional and much needed traffic growth at competitive prices in Stansted”. UK Competition Commission similarly welcomed (20-Aug-2012) the development and stated it would be closely involved with the sales process "to ensure the suitability of the new owner". London Gatwick also welcomed (20-Aug-2012) the decision, which it believes "will increase competition in the airport market and improve customer service". Ryanair, Manchester Airports Group (MAG) and Incheon Airport Authority are among the parties reportedly interested in the airport. As previously reported, Ryanair deputy CEO Howard Millar last month said the airline has been approached by potential buyers with the view to joining a consortium bid. He said: "We have met these consortia and they want us to be an anchor tenant." [more - original PR - BAA] [more - original PR - UK Competition Commission] [more - original PR - Ryanair] [more - original PR - London Gatwick]
BAA to sell Stansted Airport
You may also be interested in the following articles...
Airport privatisation: The ‘R’ word (renationalisation) hangs over the world’s privatised airports
Renationalisation is not a word often associated with the privatised airports business. But with little warning Bolivia has done just that, while politicians in Wales (UK) are about to do the same with the airport serving that nation’s capital city. “Lack of investment” is given as the reason in both (and other) cases.
But is that really the case?
Similar reasons – investment deficiencies – have been put forward for the failure of some airport operating groups to win over the media, public and, most importantly, the travelling public.
Monarch Group - not absolute ruler, but on course to profit in FY2013 with strong turnaround
On 12-Jun-2013, privately owned Monarch Group published its annual report and accounts (for the year to Oct-2012) for the first time and issued a trading update for 1HFY2013. The group also says that, following a Nov-2011 re-financing, its turnaround strategy is on course to return the loss-making group to profit in FY2013.
Monarch Group, which includes tour operations and aircraft engineering in addition to scheduled leisure airline Monarch Airlines, is currently considering an order of up to 62 new aircraft for delivery up to 2024. Executive chairman Iain Rawlinson has recently denied that the company is seeking a public listing or new shareholders.
Nevertheless, the size of this planned aircraft order and the first-time publication of an annual report, which reveals an under-capitalised balance sheet, may well fuel speculation that the group is indeed considering just that.